Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, but torque is 10 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 6.0 | |
| Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 45 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1000 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1150 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.50 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 533 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1960 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.2 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`195 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |