Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Grand Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 15 HP less power than Renault Grand Scenic, but torque is 10 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 5.5 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1220 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.68 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 208 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2063 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.4 metres less than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`170 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 4000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |