Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Nissan Serena 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13 seconds | |
|
Nissan Serena is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 35 HP less power than Nissan Serena, but torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Serena. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.83 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm longer than the Nissan Serena, 12 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`160 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Nissan Serena has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Nissan Serena, so Nissan Serena quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Nissan Serena has
| |