Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Mazda 5 2008

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Mazda 5
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP143 HP
Torque: 310 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds11 seconds
Mazda 5 is a more dynamic driving.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 28 HP less power than Mazda 5, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Mazda 5. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km7.1 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1110 km on highway
980 km with real consumption840 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.51 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.73 m1.67 m
Volkswagen Sharan is larger.
Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data112 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data112 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1566 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 5.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`250
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 22002000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mazda 5 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv