Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Mazda 5 2008

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Mazda 5
2008 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP110 HP
Torque: 310 NM310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.7 seconds13.9 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 5 HP more power than Mazda 5, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.36.1
Real fuel consumption: 7.1 l/100km6.9 l/100km
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 30 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 5.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1110 km in combined cycle980 km in combined cycle
1340 km on highway1110 km on highway
980 km with real consumption860 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.51 m
Width: 1.81 m1.76 m
Height: 1.73 m1.67 m
Volkswagen Sharan is larger.
Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm longer than the Mazda 5, 6 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm higher.
Seats: no data7 seats
Trunk capacity: no data112 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: no data112 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1678 litres
Turning diameter: 10.9 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres more than that of the Mazda 5.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0002`245
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
low

below average
Average price (€): 26003000
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Mazda 5 has
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv