Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Honda Stream 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen Sharan) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Honda Stream) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 192 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Honda Stream is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 41 HP less power than Honda Stream, but torque is 118 NM more than Honda Stream. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 4.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Honda Stream. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine: In 2001, Honda introduced the K-series engine lineup, featuring an aluminum block with an open-deck design and cast-iron cylinder liners. It utilizes a port fuel injection system, a 16-valve aluminum cylinder head without hydraulic lifters, individual ignition coils, a VTC cam ... More about Honda Stream 2001 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm longer than the Honda Stream, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 14 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 158 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1520 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Honda Stream. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Honda Stream has
| |