Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Citroen C8 2004
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 HP | 130 HP | |
Torque: | 310 NM | 315 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.7 seconds | 13.6 seconds | |
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 15 HP less power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Citroen C8. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1090 km in combined cycle | |
1340 km on highway | 1310 km on highway | ||
980 km with real consumption | 970 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm lower. | |||
Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`500 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Citroen C8 has
| |