Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Citroen C8 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 138 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 48 HP less power than Citroen C8, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Citroen C8. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.3 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C8. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1110 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1340 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1030 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.86 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 10 cm shorter than the Citroen C8, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2948 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 2`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Citroen C8 has
| |