Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.1 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 810 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 1 metres less than that of the Seat Alhambra, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`900 kg | 2`480 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |