Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Opel Zafira 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain and belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 10 HP more power than Opel Zafira, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Opel Zafira. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Zafira is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 270 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 690 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 9 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Audi A4, Skoda Octavia, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Sharan might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Sharan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.64 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 16 cm longer than the Opel Zafira, 1 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 140 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 140 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1820 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.2 metres less than that of the Opel Zafira. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`080 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Opel Zafira has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Opel Zafira, so Opel Zafira quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2600 | 1800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 6.1/10 | 6.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Opel Zafira has
| |