Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Hyundai H1 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 191 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 15 HP more power than Hyundai H1, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Hyundai H1. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Sharan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan 2000 1.8 engine: The weakest link in this engine is the turbine, whose failure is contributed to by a faulty catalytic converter. The oil pump and chain tensioner also tend to have problems. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.88 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller. Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 480 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`900 | 2`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Hyundai H1 has
| |