Volkswagen Sharan 2011 vs Seat Alhambra 2010

 
Volkswagen Sharan
2011 -
Seat Alhambra
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.4 Petrol

Performance

Power: 200 HP150 HP
Torque: 280 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.3 seconds9.9 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 50 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.47.6
Real fuel consumption: 10.9 l/100km9.2 l/100km
The Seat Alhambra is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 120 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra.
Fuel tank capacity: 70 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle920 km in combined cycle
1060 km on highway1060 km on highway
640 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption
Seat Alhambra gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.85 m4.85 m
Width: 1.90 m1.90 m
Height: 1.74 m1.72 m
Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 809 litres267 litres
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity.
Volkswagen Sharan has 542 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra.
Turning diameter: 11.9 meters11.9 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3602`310
Safety:
Quality:
low

low
Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 15 00012 200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • roomier boot
Seat Alhambra has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv