Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.9 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 25 HP more power than Seat Alhambra, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Seat Alhambra. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.5 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1450 km on highway | 1550 km on highway | ||
| 980 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 267 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 542 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`340 | 2`340 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |