Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Volkswagen Touran 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 20 HP less power than Volkswagen Touran, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Touran. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.6 | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 195 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1260 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1380 km on highway | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 32 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 8 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 834 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1980 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Sharan has 25 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. This could mean that the Volkswagen Sharan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 13 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |