Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Volkswagen Caravelle 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Caravelle, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Volkswagen Caravelle. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 8.3 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 2.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caravelle, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 360 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Sharan gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.89 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.99 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 4 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Caravelle, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 25 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 3`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 21 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Volkswagen Caravelle has
| |