Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Renault Trafic 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 55 HP more power than Renault Trafic, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Renault Trafic. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 1090 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.94 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm longer than the Renault Trafic, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 885 litres | 1240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Trafic has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Sharan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Trafic. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`370 kg | 2`790 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`728 kg | 1`785 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 642 kg | 1`005 kg | |
| Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 57 procentiem less than Renault Trafic. Therefore, Renault Trafic is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests, but Renault Trafic is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 15 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Renault Trafic has
| |