Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Renault Grand Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 60 HP more power than Renault Grand Scenic, whereas torque is 90 NM more than Renault Grand Scenic. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 4.0 | |
|
The Renault Grand Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Grand Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1320 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1350 km on highway | ||
| Renault Grand Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A3, Skoda Superb | Installed on at least 16 other car models, including Nissan Qashqai, Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Grand Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Volkswagen Sharan engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Grand Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Grand Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 22 cm longer than the Renault Grand Scenic, 4 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 533 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 809 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1737 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.5 metres more than that of the Renault Grand Scenic, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Renault Grand Scenic has
| |