Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Nissan Primastar 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 15.1 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 55 HP more power than Nissan Primastar, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Nissan Primastar. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 7.5 | |
|
The Volkswagen Sharan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Primastar, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 240 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 90 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.78 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.94 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 7 cm longer than the Nissan Primastar, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 20 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 2150 litres | |
|
Nissan Primastar has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Sharan has 1341 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Primastar. This could mean that the Volkswagen Sharan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Nissan Primastar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`790 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 14 800 | 5800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Nissan Primastar has
| |