Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2019
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 20 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 5 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 965 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2020 litres | |
|
Ford S-Max has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Volkswagen Sharan has 156 litres less trunk space than the Ford S-Max. This could mean that the Volkswagen Sharan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`555 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 18 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |