Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 10 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 50 NM less than Ford S-Max. Despite less power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1290 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 930 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 809 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2020 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`615 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |