Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Ford S-Max is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 40 HP less power than Ford S-Max, whereas torque is 100 NM less than Ford S-Max. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 60 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1180 km in combined cycle | 1270 km in combined cycle | |
| 1290 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 285 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 809 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2020 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`370 | 2`575 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Ford S-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Sharan has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Ford S-Max, so Ford S-Max quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 13 400 | 9400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Ford S-Max has
| |