Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Fiat Scudo 2012
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 170 HP | 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.8 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 42 HP more power than Fiat Scudo, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Fiat Scudo. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 80 litres | |
| 920 km with real consumption | 1020 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.98 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger, but lower. Volkswagen Sharan is 5 cm longer than the Fiat Scudo, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 24 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 885 litres | 5000 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | no data | |
|
Fiat Scudo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Volkswagen Sharan uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres less than that of the Fiat Scudo. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`370 kg | 2`856 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Sharan scores higher in safety tests, but Fiat Scudo is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Sharan scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 13 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Fiat Scudo has
| |