Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 7.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.3 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Sharan over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Sharan consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1060 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 300 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 300 litres | 267 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 885 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2297 litres | 1339 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage space (by 33 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 958 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`290 kg | 2`500 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`742 kg | 1`790 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 548 kg | 710 kg | |
| Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 30 procentiem less than Seat Alhambra. Therefore, Seat Alhambra is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Seat Alhambra has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Seat Alhambra quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 800 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |