Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Renault Espace 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 8.6 seconds | |
|
Renault Espace is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Sharan engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Renault Espace. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Sharan reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.2 | 6.2 | |
|
The Renault Espace is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Sharan consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Sharan could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 1140 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Renault Espace are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 247 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 247 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 809 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`290 | 2`410 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Espace has
| |