Volkswagen Sharan 2015 vs Ford S-Max 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 220 HP | 150 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 - 380 NM | 240 - 450 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 - 12.6 seconds | 8.4 - 12.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 - 7.3 | 5.0 - 7.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.72 m | 1.66 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 955 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
2430 litres | 2020 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 670 litres more trunk space than the Ford S-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 410 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`478 | ~ 2`543 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
| |