Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Volkswagen Passat 1997

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Volkswagen Passat
1997 - 2000
Body: Minivan / MPVEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.81.6 - 2.8

Performance

Power: 90 - 174 HP90 - 193 HP
Torque: 170 - 235 NM140 - 310 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.8 - 19.3 seconds7.9 - 16 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.5 - 13.65.5 - 11.0
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.67 m
Width: 1.81 m1.74 m
Height: 1.73 m1.50 m
Volkswagen Sharan is 5 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Passat, 7 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 23 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data495 litres
Turning diameter: 11.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Passat, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`940~ 1`999
Safety:
Quality:
below average

below average
Average price (€): 10001200
Rating in user reviews: 7.4/10 7.3/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Sharan has
  • lower price
Volkswagen Passat has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv