Volkswagen Sharan 1997 vs Toyota Picnic 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Toyota Picnic can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 174 HP | 90 - 128 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 235 NM | 178 - 205 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.8 - 19.3 seconds | 10.8 - 13.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.5 - 13.6 | 7.7 - 9.5 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Picnic. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Picnic. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.53 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 9 cm longer than the Toyota Picnic, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 11 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 180 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1840 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Toyota Picnic, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`940 | ~ 2`007 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.4/10 | 8.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Toyota Picnic has
| |