Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Ford Galaxy 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Volkswagen Sharan is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Galaxy can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 130 - 161 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 190 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 10.5 - 11.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.5 - 8.2 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is smaller, but slightly higher. Volkswagen Sharan is 19 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Ford Galaxy has more luggage space. Volkswagen Sharan has 134 litres less trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`954 | ~ 1`768 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |