Volkswagen Sharan 2000 vs Seat Alhambra 2000
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.8 | 1.8 - 2.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 - 204 HP | 115 - 204 HP | |
| Torque: | 170 - 310 NM | 170 - 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | 9.9 - 17.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 11.9 | 6.2 - 11.9 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.63 m | |
| Width: | 1.81 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.73 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 256 litres | 256 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 2610 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 1`954 kg | ~ 2`478 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 2200 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |