Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Volkswagen Touran 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.2 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 200 HP | 90 - 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 175 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | 8.5 - 14.7 seconds | |
| In general, Volkswagen Sharan are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Volkswagen Touran. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 4.6 - 6.8 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Touran. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Touran. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 163 mm (6.4 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Sharan can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.40 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.67 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 46 cm longer than the Volkswagen Touran, 11 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 885 litres | 695 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
2430 litres | 1989 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 190 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Touran. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Sharan (by 441 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.7 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Touran, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`342 kg | ~ 2`177 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`759 kg | ~ 1`542 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 583 kg | ~ 635 kg | |
| Volkswagen Sharan load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 9 procentiem less than Volkswagen Touran. Therefore, Volkswagen Touran is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | average | |
| Average price (€): | 11 000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Volkswagen Touran has
| |