Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 200 HP | 115 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | 8.8 - 13.4 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 5.7 - 8.2 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Galaxy. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.76 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan is 4 cm longer than the Ford Galaxy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 390 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 419 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford Galaxy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`337 | ~ 2`486 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford Galaxy is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |