Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Seat Alhambra 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.4 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 200 HP | 115 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 240 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | 8.3 - 12.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 5.5 - 8.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Seat Alhambra. On average, a Volkswagen Sharan with diesel engines consumes about the same amount of fuel per 100 km as a Seat Alhambra. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.72 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Sharan and Seat Alhambra are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 267 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 542 litres more trunk space than the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Seat Alhambra. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`337 | ~ 2`343 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 12 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Seat Alhambra has
| |