Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Renault Espace 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 200 HP | 130 - 225 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 260 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | 7.6 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Espace. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.68 m | |
| Volkswagen Sharan and Renault Espace are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 247 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2035 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 562 litres more trunk space than the Renault Espace. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.1 metres more than that of the Renault Espace. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`337 | ~ 2`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | low | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 14 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Renault Espace has
| |