Volkswagen Sharan 2010 vs Ford S-Max 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.4 - 2.0 | 1.6 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 - 200 HP | 115 - 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 350 NM | 185 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 - 10.9 seconds | 7.9 - 13 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 - 8.4 | 5.2 - 8.3 | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford S-Max. On average, Volkswagen Sharan equipped with diesel engines consume 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford S-Max. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.85 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.66 m | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan is larger. Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm longer than the Ford S-Max, 2 cm wider, while the height of Volkswagen Sharan is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 809 litres | 285 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2000 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Sharan has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Sharan has 524 litres more trunk space than the Ford S-Max. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Sharan is 0.4 metres more than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Volkswagen Sharan can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`337 | ~ 2`457 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Ford S-Max is better rated in child safety tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 13 600 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Sharan has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |