Volkswagen Touran 2015 vs Ford S-Max 2019
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Hybrid | |
| Diesel (Volkswagen Touran) engines offer better fuel efficiency on highways and deliver high torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy-duty use. Hybrid (Ford S-Max) engines, however, are more fuel efficient in city traffic and produce lower emissions, especially during low-speed or stop-and-go conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 200 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.3 seconds | 9.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran and Ford S-Max have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Touran torque is 140 NM more than Ford S-Max. Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 4.8 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 10.60 € | no data | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Diesel€/l | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Touran can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Touran version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.68 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller. Volkswagen Touran is 27 cm shorter than the Ford S-Max, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 834 litres | 185 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 185 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 834 litres | 700 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1980 litres | 2020 litres | |
| In 5-seat version Volkswagen Touran has more luggage space (by 134 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Ford S-Max (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.5 metres less than that of the Ford S-Max, which means Volkswagen Touran can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`220 kg | 2`545 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`620 kg | 1`872 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 600 kg | 673 kg | |
| Volkswagen Touran load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 12 procentiem less than Ford S-Max. Therefore, Ford S-Max is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford S-Max has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Ford S-Max has
| |