Volkswagen Touran 2015 vs Renault Scenic 2016
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 110 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.9 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Touran and Renault Scenic have the same engine power, but Volkswagen Touran torque is 10 NM less than Renault Scenic. Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.4 | 4.0 | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1310 km in combined cycle | 1300 km in combined cycle | |
| 1480 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 156 mm (6.1 inches) | 170 mm (6.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Renault Scenic can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Renault Scenic version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine: The engine has undergone numerous modifications and is relatively commonplace, with a plentiful supply of spare parts. It exhibits an optimal fuel consumption/power ratio. However, the fuel injection system ... More about Renault Scenic 2016 1.5 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.53 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.66 m | 1.65 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 12 cm longer than the Renault Scenic, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 834 litres | 572 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1980 litres | 1554 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Touran has 262 litres more trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 426 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.3 metres more than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`160 kg | 2`097 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`464 kg | 1`501 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 696 kg | 596 kg | |
| Volkswagen Touran load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 14 procentiem more than Renault Scenic. Therefore, Volkswagen Touran is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Renault Scenic has serious deffects in 65 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 8400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |