Volkswagen Touran 2004 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 31 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.7 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 890 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.39 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.65 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 6 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Volkswagen Touran can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | no data | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.1/10 | 7.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |