Volkswagen Touran 2006 vs Ford C-Max 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 210 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 19 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1150 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
| 920 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Ford C-Max gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.41 m | 4.33 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.64 m | 1.60 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 8 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Volkswagen Touran can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`210 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford C-Max has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 1400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 7.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |