Volkswagen Touran 2006 vs Volkswagen Sharan 2000

 
Volkswagen Touran
2006 - 2010
Volkswagen Sharan
2000 - 2010
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.4 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 140 HP150 HP
Torque: 210 NM210 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.7 seconds12.1 seconds
Volkswagen Touran engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.510.2
Real fuel consumption: 8.1 l/100km11.6 l/100km
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 2.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 405 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 3.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 800 km in combined cycle680 km in combined cycle
980 km on highway870 km on highway
740 km with real consumption600 km with real consumption
Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.41 m4.63 m
Width: 1.79 m1.81 m
Height: 1.64 m1.73 m
Volkswagen Touran is smaller.
Volkswagen Touran is 22 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 695 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1989 litresno data
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.3 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Sharan.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0901`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

average
Volkswagen Touran has slightly fewer faults.
Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Sharan, so Volkswagen Touran quality could be a bit better.
Average price (€): 34002600
Rating in user reviews: 8.0/10 6.1/10
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Touran has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volkswagen Sharan has
  • more power
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv