Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011

Volkswagen Touran
2010 - 2015
Chevrolet Orlando
2011 - 2018
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel


Power: 170 HP163 HP
Torque: 350 NM360 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.9 seconds10 seconds
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive.
Volkswagen Touran engine produces 7 HP more power than Chevrolet Orlando, but torque is 10 NM less than Chevrolet Orlando. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.76.0
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando.
Fuel tank capacity: 60 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle1060 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway1300 km on highway
880 km with real consumption760 km with real consumption


Length: 4.40 m4.65 m
Width: 1.79 m1.88 m
Height: 1.67 m1.63 m
Volkswagen Touran is smaller, but higher.
Volkswagen Touran is 26 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Orlando, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 4 cm higher.
Seats: 5 seats7 seats
Trunk capacity: 695 litres458 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 121 litres458 litres
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: 695 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1989 litres458 litres
In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1531 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.2 meters11.3 meters
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando.
Power steering: Electric power steeringHydraulic power steering
Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering.
Gross weight (kg): 2`2002`287
Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests.
no data
Average price (€): 70006200
Pros and Cons: Volkswagen Touran has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • electric power steering
  • higher children safety
  • better safety assist technologies
Chevrolet Orlando has
  • hydraulic power steering
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: