Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan 2014
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 10 HP less power than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1160 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 800 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 144 mm (5.7 inches) | |
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.58 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 6 cm longer than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1989 litres | 1520 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Touran has 195 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 469 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`220 kg | 1`990 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`603 kg | 1`492 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 617 kg | 498 kg | |
| Volkswagen Touran load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 19 procentiem more than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan. Therefore, Volkswagen Touran is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | below average | high | |
| Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan, so Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Volkswagen Golf Sportsvan has
| |