Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Toyota Verso 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 126 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 310 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 14 HP more power than Toyota Verso, whereas torque is 10 NM more than Toyota Verso. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Verso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1240 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Verso gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Auris, Toyota Corolla Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.46 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 6 cm shorter than the Toyota Verso, width is practically the same , while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 484 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 1740 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Touran has 211 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Verso. The Toyota Verso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Verso, which means Volkswagen Touran can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`260 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | below average | above average | |
| Toyota Verso has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Verso, so Toyota Verso quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 9000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Toyota Verso has
| |