Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 360 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Touran engine produces 23 HP less power than Chevrolet Orlando, whereas torque is 40 NM less than Chevrolet Orlando. Despite less power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1200 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 900 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 440'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Orlando engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Used also on Chevrolet Cruze | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Touran might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Touran is 26 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Orlando, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 121 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 695 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 458 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1531 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`287 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Chevrolet Orlando has
| |