Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 215 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 25 HP more power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Ford C-Max. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Ford C-Max is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 2 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Touran has 263 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 305 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 1`915 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran scores higher in safety tests, but Ford C-Max is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 7400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |