Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
| Volkswagen Touran and Ford C-Max have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 30 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1170 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1360 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford C-Max engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Focus, Ford Mondeo, Ford Galaxy, Ford S-Max | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volkswagen Touran might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran is 2 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 432 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 1684 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Touran has 263 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 305 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | average | |
| Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 15 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 6.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |