Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 12.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 28 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 5.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Volkswagen Touran is 7 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Touran has 195 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres less than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| Volkswagen Touran has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Citroen C4 Picasso has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Volkswagen Touran, so Volkswagen Touran quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |