Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Citroen C4 Picasso 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 140 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 270 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.9 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 28 HP more power than Citroen C4 Picasso, whereas torque is 50 NM more than Citroen C4 Picasso. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.3 | 4.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 5.8 l/100km | |
|
The Citroen C4 Picasso is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Volkswagen Touran could require 195 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1370 km in combined cycle | |
| 1300 km on highway | 1440 km on highway | ||
| 950 km with real consumption | 940 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Peugeot 308, Citroen C3, Citroen C5, Peugeot 207, Citroen C4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Citroen C4 Picasso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine: The engine is very durable and can last a long time with proper maintenance, and is also quite economical for its power. There may be some problems with the turbine geometry. It is important to use good ... More about Volkswagen Touran 2010 2.0 engine Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine: This diesel engine is known for its high reliability and impressive lifespan, combined with excellent fuel efficiency for its power output. It features hydraulic lifters in the cylinder head and uses a Common ... More about Citroen C4 Picasso 2013 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Touran is 4 cm shorter than the Citroen C4 Picasso, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 537 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | no data | |
|
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Volkswagen Touran has 158 litres more trunk space than the Citroen C4 Picasso. The Citroen C4 Picasso may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.4 metres more than that of the Citroen C4 Picasso. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`190 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | |||
| The Citroen C4 Picasso scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Citroen C4 Picasso has
| |