Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Chevrolet Orlando 2011
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 90 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 315 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.7 seconds | 10.3 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Orlando is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 40 HP less power than Chevrolet Orlando, whereas torque is 85 NM less than Chevrolet Orlando. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 4.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 2.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 1060 km in combined cycle | |
| 1330 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 1010 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.65 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.63 m | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is smaller, but higher. Volkswagen Touran is 26 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Orlando, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 121 litres | 458 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 695 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 458 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Chevrolet Orlando has more luggage space (by 337 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 1531 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Orlando. | |||
| Power steering: | Electric power steering | Hydraulic power steering | |
| Electric power steering is simpler, quieter, more fuel-efficient, more configurable and provides additional features such as auto-steering for lane assist and parking. The disadvantages of electric power steering are possible overheating under prolonged load conditions and insufficient feedback (feeling) during steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`287 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7000 | 6000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Chevrolet Orlando has
| |