Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Ford C-Max 2007
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 105 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 9.6 seconds | |
Ford C-Max is a more dynamic driving. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 31 HP less power than Ford C-Max, whereas torque is 70 NM less than Ford C-Max. Due to the lower power, Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.1 | 5.6 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford C-Max. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1170 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
1330 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 850 km with real consumption | ||
Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine: In early production engines, the camshaft timing chain often stretched, requiring timely replacement to avoid potential issues. The fuel system, equipped with piezo injectors, is highly sensitive to fuel ... More about Ford C-Max 2007 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.40 m | 4.33 m | |
Width: | 1.79 m | 1.82 m | |
Height: | 1.67 m | 1.60 m | |
Volkswagen Touran is 7 cm longer than the Ford C-Max, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Volkswagen Touran is 7 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 550 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 1620 litres | |
Volkswagen Touran has more luggage capacity. Volkswagen Touran has 145 litres more trunk space than the Ford C-Max. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Touran (by 369 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford C-Max, which means Volkswagen Touran can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`200 | 1`990 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | high | |
Ford C-Max has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volkswagen Touran has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Ford C-Max, so Ford C-Max quality is probably better | |||
Average price (€): | 6400 | 3000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.0/10 | 4.8/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Ford C-Max has
| |