Volkswagen Touran 2010 vs Volkswagen Caddy 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.4 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 105 HP | |
| Torque: | 220 NM | 175 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Volkswagen Touran is more dynamic to drive. Volkswagen Touran engine produces 45 HP more power than Volkswagen Caddy, whereas torque is 45 NM more than Volkswagen Caddy. Thanks to more power Volkswagen Touran reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.1 l/100km | 7.9 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Touran is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Volkswagen Touran consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy, which means that by driving the Volkswagen Touran over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Volkswagen Touran consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1570 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| 840 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Touran gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 159 mm (6.3 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volkswagen Caddy can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volkswagen Caddy version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from two 4x4 versions of Volkswagen Caddy 2010 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
| Volkswagen Caddy 2010 1.2 engine: Although the engine has a chain, its lifetime is relatively short. Vibration at idling speed tends to be excessive. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.41 m | |
| Width: | 1.79 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.86 m | |
| Volkswagen Touran and Volkswagen Caddy are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 695 litres | 560 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1989 litres | 3200 litres | |
| Volkswagen Touran has 135 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Caddy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Caddy (by 1211 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Volkswagen Touran is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Caddy. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`220 | 2`180 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Volkswagen Touran scores higher in safety tests, but Volkswagen Caddy is better rated in child safety tests. The Volkswagen Touran scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | below average | below average | |
| Volkswagen Touran has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Caddy, so Volkswagen Touran quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6400 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Volkswagen Touran has
|
Volkswagen Caddy has
| |